<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Strategic Planning @ PCM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What we value: Values? by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/what-we-value-values/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Tom used the term decriptive rather than distinctive. I think the first distinctive begs the question &quot;From who - or what?&quot; Other Presbys - that&#039;s the last specific in the paragraph, other Christian churchs - earlier in sentence, or who? 

Then the second time when we say distinquishes (to me anyway) repeats the qustion - &quot;From who?&quot;

Thought - &quot;...about PCM? No, we feel that beyond these beliefs there are values that would make distinquish us from othe (most other?)r churches in the greater Manchester community. 

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom used the term decriptive rather than distinctive. I think the first distinctive begs the question &#8220;From who &#8211; or what?&#8221; Other Presbys &#8211; that&#8217;s the last specific in the paragraph, other Christian churchs &#8211; earlier in sentence, or who? </p>
<p>Then the second time when we say distinquishes (to me anyway) repeats the qustion &#8211; &#8220;From who?&#8221;</p>
<p>Thought &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;about PCM? No, we feel that beyond these beliefs there are values that would make distinquish us from othe (most other?)r churches in the greater Manchester community. </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value the Gospel by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-the-gospel/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Solo means &#039;alone&#039; - but not singular - it means alone as in only.  If you&#039;ve been aroung the Solas you know this - but is this confusing to anyone else but me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solo means &#8216;alone&#8217; &#8211; but not singular &#8211; it means alone as in only.  If you&#8217;ve been aroung the Solas you know this &#8211; but is this confusing to anyone else but me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value a Reasoned Faith by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-a-reasoned-faith-2/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=98#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I find ...&quot;helpful for helping...&quot; to be awkward. &quot;Reason is useful for helping...&quot; isn&#039;t any better is it? Whole last paragraph is too &quot;cute&quot; for me - But hey, that&#039;s only me and my reasoning is not always a reasonable reason tor re-write the thoughts on reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find &#8230;&#8221;helpful for helping&#8230;&#8221; to be awkward. &#8220;Reason is useful for helping&#8230;&#8221; isn&#8217;t any better is it? Whole last paragraph is too &#8220;cute&#8221; for me &#8211; But hey, that&#8217;s only me and my reasoning is not always a reasonable reason tor re-write the thoughts on reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value the Fellowship of the Local Church by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-the-fellowship-of-the-local-church/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-96</guid>
		<description>To one o my other responses - is this the place to emphasis corporate worship/gathering? 

No one gets lost at PCM. We care about you enough to note your absenses, pray for your needs and minister to you during the week - not just Sundays. Not sure how to wordsmith that idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To one o my other responses &#8211; is this the place to emphasis corporate worship/gathering? </p>
<p>No one gets lost at PCM. We care about you enough to note your absenses, pray for your needs and minister to you during the week &#8211; not just Sundays. Not sure how to wordsmith that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value Worship by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-worship-2/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I would alter&quot;... fron the singing to the sermon...&quot; - I think that only highlights two of the elements of worship and is both restrictive and omissive (is that a word?) - What about everything else - the greetings, the offering, Communion, etc.? I&#039;d just omit or say &quot;... everything we do in the time together is all...&quot;

I love the use of &quot;joy&quot;. Its a word we avoid but really one we should haave as part of everyday life. We need more JOY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would alter&#8221;&#8230; fron the singing to the sermon&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; I think that only highlights two of the elements of worship and is both restrictive and omissive (is that a word?) &#8211; What about everything else &#8211; the greetings, the offering, Communion, etc.? I&#8217;d just omit or say &#8220;&#8230; everything we do in the time together is all&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the use of &#8220;joy&#8221;. Its a word we avoid but really one we should haave as part of everyday life. We need more JOY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value Spiritual Formation by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-spiritual-formation/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Too brief - needs more said is this the place to add something about placing us in a church (as opposed to home church), This is a lifelong task - isn&#039;t ended when we die.

Just feels like there&#039;s something left out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too brief &#8211; needs more said is this the place to add something about placing us in a church (as opposed to home church), This is a lifelong task &#8211; isn&#8217;t ended when we die.</p>
<p>Just feels like there&#8217;s something left out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value our Gifts by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-our-gifts-2/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=106#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I like the thought of never having it all - although I&#039;m obviously one of those that &quot;thinks he knows it all...&quot; Lots to learn. 

No edits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the thought of never having it all &#8211; although I&#8217;m obviously one of those that &#8220;thinks he knows it all&#8230;&#8221; Lots to learn. </p>
<p>No edits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value Redemptive Outreach by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-redemptive-outreach/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I have no changes to these paragraphs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no changes to these paragraphs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value Adventure by wayne</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/we-value-adventure-2/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I  would alter &quot;still in the middleof&quot; with living (And since we&#039;re living the story...)

Agree with Tom&#039;s thought on gloification - technical word. Does it work as - &quot;... the resurrection of the dead which are God&#039;s elect.&quot;  Even then elect has a very specific meaning. 

I&#039;d add something about eternity. &quot;to live with Him forever and ever.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  would alter &#8220;still in the middleof&#8221; with living (And since we&#8217;re living the story&#8230;)</p>
<p>Agree with Tom&#8217;s thought on gloification &#8211; technical word. Does it work as &#8211; &#8220;&#8230; the resurrection of the dead which are God&#8217;s elect.&#8221;  Even then elect has a very specific meaning. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d add something about eternity. &#8220;to live with Him forever and ever.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Value: Worship by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/we-value-worship/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strategicplanningpcm.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I recommend switching the word &quot;laity&quot; for &quot;congregation&quot;.  Maybe this is too picky but laity normally stands in a binary relationship with clergy, which here is contrasted with elders. While technically correct it seems to be less precise than it could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend switching the word &#8220;laity&#8221; for &#8220;congregation&#8221;.  Maybe this is too picky but laity normally stands in a binary relationship with clergy, which here is contrasted with elders. While technically correct it seems to be less precise than it could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
